Case Studies

MAP monitoring that drives measurable price-violation declines.

When brands cross-reference identified sellers from Brand Protection with their MAP service, price violations fall sharply and stay down. Here is what the tracked data shows.

Talk to an Expert About MAP Monitoring

63.58%avg. violation decrease (12 mo., 3 brands)

80.5%avg. decrease, 3P sellers (3 mo.)

88%avg. decrease, authorized sellers (3 mo.)

Case study

Cross-referencing Brand Protection with MAP

In a study of 3 different brands, who have all taken advantage of cross-referencing the identified sellers from Brand Protection with their MAP service, we've seen an average price violation decrease of 63.58% over a tracked 12-month period. The violation decrease range falling between 50% and 73% on average.

Average price violation decrease across three brands over twelve months

Case study

Third-party (3P) seller violations

Price violation decrease for third-party sellers over three months

In tracking price violations from 3P sellers over a 3-month period, we saw an average price violation decrease of 80.5%. The average range of violations decreased from 71–90%.

Case study

Authorized seller violations

In tracking price violations from authorized sellers over a 3-month period, we saw an average price violation decrease of 88%, with price violation decreases ranging from 73–92%.

Price violation decrease for authorized sellers over three months

Bring your price violations down

See how MAP monitoring combined with brand-protection enforcement can stabilize pricing across your channel. Start with a free first-pass report.

Request a Free Threat Report

Talk to an Expert